Wiscasset had a good vision - stick with it!
Dennis Dunbar
Submitted By Dennis Dunbar
Why abandon Wiscasset's vision of the future, depicted in the just
approved Comprehensive Plan? Point East quickly committed to support and
adapt to the plan with their Maritime Village and light industrial i.Park
in 2004. Those plans, carefully developed and compatible with Wiscasset's
historic character and its maritime history, were applauded for their
vision and their preservation of Wiscasset's "Quality of Place". Are we
abandoning this vision just because it's hard to implement? Do we really
want to give up on the diversified jobs and broad based economic
opportunities promised at the Maritime Village and in the i.Park, and the
tax relief that was inherent in that wiser plan?
In 2004 Point East proposed to bring 5-10 businesses a year into a
light industry park called i-Park on 450 acres formerly owned by Maine
Yankee. Rynel, Inc, lined-up and ready to go, was to be the first of
many. All Wiscasset voters had to do was approve the investments in the
roads and utilities. They voted to spend the money, and Wiscasset approved
a low interest $2 million loan so that Point East could go forward with
the i.Park plan. Wiscasset even handed them a $1 million federal earmark
grant, for the purposes of developing a technology park. Wiscasset kept
its end of the bargain.
Now we are told that the only way to get the good jobs and lower
property taxes promised is to abandon that clean "light industry" plan and
go down the path of a dirty "heavy industrial" coal plant and diesel
refinery. Do we really want to let Point East off the hook for delivering
on the promises made just a few years ago? Does Point East get a "do over"
just because they haven't succeeded in developing the Maritime Village or
bringing in the businesses they promised, when they promised? Does the
ordinary citizen receive breaks on their bills just because the economy is
weak at the moment?
Here's a better idea: Hold their feet to the fire and demand results!
Point East is accountable to the taxpayers of Wiscasset, and we should
insist that they deliver on their previous promises. If Point East cannot
deliver, we should get someone who can. By taking us down the coal plant
dirt road, they are no longer working on getting the light industries they
promised. Would you invest in a new home or business neighboring on a
coal plant? Fulfilling the Comprehensive Plan visions may well be harder
work for them than the "hail Mary" pass of a dirty coal plant. But it will
be far better for Wiscasset - better for us financially, better for our
family's health, better for our current fisheries industry and tourist
based businesses, better for the region and global environment. And let's
not forget about the impact on our neighbors!
Remember this reality: If we vote "yes" on the ordinance change for
the coal plant, a cloud of economic uncertainty will cover Wiscasset.
Clean light industries will no longer want to relocate to the i-Park.
Tourist based investments will halt. Since the coal plant is just not
economically viable (the true cost is twice what we have been told and
will go far higher when carbon capture and sequestration are inevitably
mandated) it will fail to garner investor support. (As have several
similar plant proposals recently) Wiscasset will really get nothing but
lower property values and fewer good jobs until the mess is sorted out.
With growth frozen and values declining our tax rate will go up, not
down.
For Point East, getting our ordinance changed so a coal plant can be
built is an easy way out of the hard work of proper development of the
site. They get off easy, and can sell the property to a multinational
petroleum company with the project designed and built by another
multinational construction company then skip town, while Wiscasset gets to
live with dirty industry, foul air, and a village that is by-passed by
all.
The original vision, if competently implemented by now, would have
given us more than a dozen new businesses and several hundred new jobs.
The property tax base would have increased significantly. The town would
have grown with diverse new businesses attracted to the natural beauty of
our area. Our property taxes would have gone down. You would have seen the
$625 property tax savings you were promised by Point East when they asked
you to approve the Shoreland Business Zone II ordinance investments a few
years ago. Remember that un-kept promise?
Instead, Point East has now proposed a different vision. Wiscasset
would become a dirty industrial town. Property values would drop as a
result (20 percent up to 50 percent, depending on proximity to the plant,
according to some local real estate professionals), new clean businesses
would shy away, and tourists would by-pass Wiscasset in search for "the
way life really should be." Wiscasset can do better.
Let's Stick With the Current Vision in our Comprehensive Plan; with a
"Light Industry" i-Park! The comprehensive plan, and its writers, never
envisioned heavy industry in the old Maine Yankee property. These people,
who are your neighbors, felt their voices should be heard above those of
corporate interests.
Wiscasset had a good plan for good clean jobs, a healthy environment
for our family and for property tax relief. Let's stick with it. Vote
"NO" on Questions 2, 3, 4 and 5!
Don't be fooled by false promises and slick advertising. Remember the
old adage: If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!
For more information, visit our web site:
www.backriveralliance.org.
|