A proposal to National RE/sources
Paula Gibbs
With just a week and five days to go before the November 6 vote on
changing Wiscasset's height ordinance, the voices on both sides are
getting shriller and shriller. Is there anyone out there who hasn't
already made up his or her mind? I haven't, and I suspect I'm in the
minority.
There are a host of problems with this proposed gasification plant and
by now we're all weary of hearing about them. There are a host of
possibilities for the town of Wiscasset, if this thing could be built and
not hurt the environment. It's either doom and gloom or riches for
everyone. I believe it's neither. Yes, this is the most beautiful place on
earth, and we have to protect it, but we're starving economically. No one
can say categorically that this plant can't be built without ruining the
environment, any more than the developer can say he will reduce our taxes
by over 80 percent and give us 200 jobs.
About a month ago, someone suggested that National RE/sources, the
developer of the proposed $1.5 billion Twin River Energy Center, come up
with a comparatively small amount of money (in comparison to the total
cost of the plant which some say will be more like $3 billion or $4
billion) - say, $500,000 - to pay for an independent, unbiased, scientific
study that would get us some answers to questions like coal storage, coal
transportation, coal stockpiling, mercury emissions, keeping carbon
dioxide from going into the atmosphere, turbine engine noise, and water
sources. I think most people have made up their minds about this, and
until a genuinely objective source starts providing information, most
people are operating on emotions, not information. If National RE/sources
believes what they're telling us, they should be willing to prove it. What
do you say, National RE/sources?
|  |
|